Global and Multicultural Issues.

MRKT1199-1299-4177                                                                  Updated September 2023                       

Entering global markets can be quite rewarding as well as risky for companies looking to expand and increase their market share in the face of shrinking domestic markets especially in the food, beverages and tobacco industries to name a few. While many entrants overseas have met with phenomenal success a fair number have failed to come to terms with the vagaries of operating and understanding consumer behavior  in a foreign culture.

For one, companies are wary of over adapting their strategy to an extent where they lose their originality and identity as a global brand, and on the other forcing their brand upon the local populace without considering local tastes and cultural context. In many cases  glocalization, a  balanced approach of the above two strategies is much better suited to their success overseas.

The political environment can also play havoc with a company’s operations overseas, the most recent example being the war in Ukraine. The war has led to sanctions on Russia primarily by the majority of countries in the West including NATO allies. This has  led over 1,000 Western businesses pulling out of Russia, whereas around 200 businesses have done nothing to leave mainly because of complexities. Some companies to leave are: Starbucks, McDonalds, Pizza Hut, Visa, Coca-Cola, KFC to name just a few. These Corporations have had to cut ties and sell off their assets to local proprietors at throw away prices, these local proprietors have then re-branded to Russian brand names with only slight changes to their products. Companies do need to carry out a through risk-analysis in the planning stage before investing capital in countries that may have had a past history of political turmoil or even a more recent or current change where politicians are looking at changing policies and strategies, when relationships  that were once considered stable become quite volatile. The most recent example being in the former French colonies in Africa, with coups in Burkina Faso, Guinea, Niger, Mali and just this week 30th August 23′ in Gabon. In all these strongly French  allied countries democratically elected governments have been overthrown in coups by the military with local populations celebrating in the streets. These countries have long been controlled by French Multi-Nationals exploiting rare mineral and oil resources and now their survival is in threat by either nationalization, confiscation or expropriation.

Focusing on two well known companies Starbucks and IKEA that have gone the global route, it is beneficial  to learn from their experience entering the Indian and Chinese market with product, pricing and location decisions. Firms can learn lessons from others mistakes on how they may overcome  dilemmas and challenges while seeking to enter overseas markets,

It is important to know the background and history of hot beverage drinking in India, which has historically been known as a tea drinking nation dating back to British colonization being preceded by the entry of the East India Company in the mid 18th century. The British introduced tea agriculture in a big way, leading to  mass consumption after a successful advertising campaign by the tea board in the 1920’s.

Starbucks while considering entry into the Indian market, thoroughly researched consumer habits and behavior for six years  before confidently making an entry. Starbucks opened their first store in October, 2012 in an upscale area of downtown Mumbai. Howard Schultz commenting. “It is perhaps the most elegant, beautiful, dynamic store we have opened in our history.”

A great advantage to Starbucks was their carefully selected partnership with  the Tata Group a giant Indian conglomerate and one of the largest coffee producers in Asia. This partnership provided them with some of the most valuable prime locations to set up shop in Mumbai and Delhi with the Elphinstone Building and the Taj Mahal hotel sites getting them off to a great start.  The menu featuring a blend of western and local delights  in the shape of mouth watering murg (chicken) tikka panini, tandoori paneer (cheese) rolls and cardamom (elaichi) cookies.

In comparison in China, Starbucks went with the Chinese need to relax in more spacious surroundings, building bigger stores 3,800 sq. ft. and upward. Menu items included Chinese teas and moon cakes.

A Frappuccino is priced to a growing middle class in India at $3.35 compared to products being priced 20% higher in China than other markets, begging the question why the higher price in China compared to Western markets.

Starbucks went with a glocalization  strategy (a combination of a global and local strategy) to succeed in both India and China, adapting the product, catering to local tastes at the same time maintaining its Western image globally thru offering its original service and products as well.

IKEA’s entry into India had been more slow and on the cautious side, having to consider several key issues like the DIY culture  and remote locations of stores away from cities which could pose a serious challenge to visitors. They launched their first store in India on August 9, 2018 after over a decade of research and planning. Fine tuning their strategy they more recently opened their first in-city store in Worli-Mumbai in May, 2022 as well as opening it’s first in-mall store in Mumbai’s Ghatkopar (West) area.

One key lesson they learned from their China experience is that DIY (do it yourself) will not work in India for locals are not keen to assemble and would rather have a do-it-for-me model in place which Home Depot did not practice in China and paid the price having to close down their remaining  operations in 2012.

In China IKEA started with a higher price model which subsequently had to be lowered by 50% for the PPP (Purchasing power parity) may have been higher but income levels were quite lower for the intended target market, each potential Chinese customer earning $400 a month.

After initial experience IKEA realized that if they built bigger stores the crowd would come, now eight of their 10 biggest stores in the world are in China where their outlets have 40% more traffic than other countries with customers treating them as destination stores spending a significant part of the day, exploring, relaxing and dining their time away.

IKEA also had to come to terms with its positioning strategy in China initially focusing on the 20 to 35 year old market and then repositioning to include the wealthier 35 to 45 age segment with children.

When entering India IKEA looked upon their experiences entering other emerging markets including China and adapted to local customs and tastes. One way was by serving biryani and samosas in their huge cafeterias instead of Swedish meatballs ….. maybe next on the menu…. butter chicken and chicken tikka.

MRKT4177 students please structure your two to three page paper outlining. Key Issues, Analysis of key issues and Recommendations.  Do your own research and cite your sources at the end of your paper.

MRKT199 students answer the following questions below on one typed page. Cite your sources at the end of your paper.

Q 1.  Could IKEA and Home Depot have avoided some of the mistakes they made while entering the Chinese market. Explain how they might have done a better job of understanding and applying consumer behavior.

Q 2.  How might a firm increase their chances of success while entering foreign markets. What steps did Starbucks take in this direction in India and China.

Q 3.  Howard Schultz commented at the store opening in Mumbai, ” It is perhaps the most elegant, beautiful, dynamic store we have opened in our history”.  What aspects of consumer behavior do you feel were in his mind while making that comment.

Q 4.  What do you think companies might have done or looked at proactively, to reduce the political risk and losses they faced by having to suddenly leave Russia.

About imranraza

Marketing Professor, Kwantlen Polytechnic University. Areas of interest, Consumer Behavior, Advertising, Retail Management and Contemporary Issues in Marketing. Sports and Hobbies, Squash, Golf, and Contract Bridge.
This entry was posted in Contemporary issues in marketing., International Marketing, Marketing and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

28 Responses to Global and Multicultural Issues.

  1. Samir says:

    thx, for posting, an interesting article!!!

    Like

  2. Christopher Coles says:

    I think it was smart of Starbucks to team up with a company like Tata Group, sometimes in Business you need to stay humble and realize that its better to team up with a company that is already established in the short term you make less but it opens more doors for you, its like knowing the bouncer at the club so you don’t have to wait in line.

    I personally like the fact that IKEA is being cautious and looking at the market before entering (First store after 2018) measure twice cut once has always been my philosophy in Business.

    I personally dislike both company’s and do not buy from either but respect the business skills the CEO’s have making both brands.

    Like

  3. Aiman Rasheed says:

    Very insightful article. I personally think many countries are also homogenizing in terms of culture. For example, in India, like the above video mentions how India didn’t use to be a coffee drinking population, however, with the influence of the internet the audience has increased without having to do a thing and its now the norm to be a coffee drinker there. So I believe a company like Starbucks will be quite successful as long as the locations selected make business sense.

    Similarly, a country’s average income and currency makes a great difference in terms of pricing. I was recently on vacation to Dubai and I payed almost 8 dollars for a coffee at Starbucks where I would pay less than half of that here in Canada.

    Reading your article helped me look back and realize that it’s actually profitable for Starbucks to have higher prices in the Middle East where tourism from the West and Europe is widely attracted and Starbucks is a trusted brand at home so people will be willing to pay the higher amount.

    Like

  4. Borna Toroghi says:

    I think that Starbucks partnering up with Tata Group helps them understand the differences between the two countries’ cultures, values, and backgrounds. Opportunities can rise for Starbucks, where more coffee shops would be established throughout India. Also, I think that the six years of researching the Indian market definitely gave Starbucks an advantage, and companies who want to enter global markets should do extensive research in order to relate to the countries, and potential clientele.
    For IKEA, it is more difficult to establish since India has a DIY attitude, therefore taking their time and being cautious may be in their advantage.

    Interesting article, thanks

    Like

  5. Alejandra Marcado says:

    Starbucks was able to succeed in the global market because of their business philosophy which is to satisfy the needs and wants of the customer. This value based thinking is undoubtedly a key to success for any firm wanting to market a product or a service. Furthermore, Starbucks did what IKEA and Home depot lacked which was intimately examining their potential cliental and making an effort to build connections. The Tata group allowed them to know which locations would be most profitable, but also most marketable, thereby, creating a demand for a coffee in a country which is not really known for it. An example excellent use of marketing.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Andy-Oscar Owusu says:

    1. Could IKEA and Home Depot have avoided the mistakes they made while entering the Chinese market. Explain how they might have done a better job of under- standing and applying consumer behavior.

    I believe that IKEA and Home Depot could have done a better job of entering the foreign markets if they had done more extensive consumer habits and behavior research. Starbuck for instance, they did six years of extensive research before even entering the market. Had IKEA had been aware that India does not adapt to a do-it-yourself model that would have saved them time and money. If Home Depot would have been aware of this. I believe they would not have had to exit the market.
    Q 2. How might a firm increase their chances of success while entering foreign markets. What steps did Starbucks take in this direction in India and China.

    A firm can increase their success of entering foreign markets by doing extensive consumer habits and behavior before entering the foreign market. Starbucks did this research for 6 years prior to entering the Indian market. Starbucks applied a “glocalization” strategy which is a combination of global and local western strategies. They also collaborated with a local Indian conglomerate the TATA, which was essential in gaining clear understanding of how the local market would react. The TATA were also essential in getting Starbucks prime real estate locations to further ensure the success of entering the foreign market in India. In China, the consumer behavior research they did allowed them to understand that Chinese customers like to shop and relax in large retail setting. This information enabled them to obtain larger retail locations which the Chinese market adapted to very well.
    Q 3. Howard Schultz commented at the store opening in Mumbai,” It is perhaps the most elegant, beautiful, dynamic store we have opened in our history.” What aspects of consumer behavior do you feel were in his mind while making that comment?

    When Howard Schultz made this comment, I believe aspects of consumer behavior he is referring to are those of the temporal nature and the shopping experience. To have an elegant beautiful and dynamic store gives the impression of a great shopping experience. One that focuses on giving the customers the most relaxed and enjoyable experience possible!

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Angelo Contreras says:

    Angelo Contreras
    Marketing Consumer Behavior 1299

    Q 1. Could IKEA and Home Depot have avoided some of the mistakes they made while entering the Chinese market. Explain how they might have done a better job of under- standing and applying consumer behavior.

    As different countries have a variety of similar and dissimilar preferences, IKEA and Home Depot should not use the same strategies for different nations; although one strategy can be successful in a country, it can also be a failure in a different nation. IKEA and Home Depot can improve the success of entering the market by understanding the culture and preferences of their market. To achieve this they need to understand the needs and wants of the market and do an internal and external search for information on their market. Like Starbucks, IKEA and Home Depot could have created a partnership with organizations in India and China or listen to locals as a way to learn about their market. By doing this they may have avoided mistakes when entering the market and understood/applied consumer behavior better.

    Q 2. How might a firm increase their chances of success while entering foreign markets. What steps did Starbucks take in this direction in India and China?

    Starbucks took the steps of a globalization strategy which is a very beneficial strategy to not lose the firm’s identity and values, while sustaining the preferences of the foreign markets. An important step Starbucks took as part of their globalization strategy for India is thoroughly researching the marketing environment before entering it. I believe this was an important factor that created the success of Starbucks in foreign countries because this helped with understanding the culture and preferences of the markets. Research also made it easier to position themselves in the right target market and may help create a competitive advantage. Starbucks also made connections and formed partnerships with Tata Group which helped Starbucks get advice from locals and gave them the advantage of excellent locations. To increase the success when entering foreign markets, a firm needs to do internal and external research and may also benefit from a globalization strategy.

    Q 3. Howard Schultz commented at the store opening in Mumbai, ” It is perhaps the most elegant, beautiful, dynamic store we have opened in our history”. What aspects of consumer behavior do you feel were in his mind while making that comment.

    Howard Schultz may have been thinking about the needs and wants of the Indian market; this could be related to the atmosphere Starbucks will portray in Mumbai as this demonstrates the intangibility of the services Starbucks provides. An elegant, beautiful, dynamic store could portray an atmosphere where individuals can relax, talk with friends, or study while drinking starbucks. This type of atmosphere may be very inviting for the communities in Mumbai. As starbucks prices may also be a bit more expensive Howard Schultz may have also been thinking about the consumers behavior when making a purchase; for example, a consumer may feel a dissonance when purchasing a drink, although the atmosphere that Starbucks provides may reduce that dissonance.

    Like

  8. Nicholas Boldt says:

    Nicholas Boldt
    Consumer Behaviour 1299
    Q 1. Could IKEA and Home Depot have avoided some of the mistakes they made while entering the Chinese market. Explain how they might have done a better job of under- standing and applying consumer behavior.
    Although different consumer markets may hold various similarities, Ikea and Home Depot should have recognized that the culture in these two countries have many differences that demand separate marketing plans. If Ikea had spent more time focusing on the consumer culture within India they could have shifted their focus to a business strategy that would have been more popular. This is the same problem Home Depot faced, the lack of knowing their target market and expecting their North American business plan to smoothly integrate into the Indian market. With more research both of these businesses should have been able to succeed, since they both have the capital necessary to.
    Q 2. How might a firm increase their chances of success while entering foreign markets. What steps did Starbucks take in this direction in India and China.
    They had thoroughly researched the market before entering it by studying it for 6 years. This helped them understand the consumers desires and the culture within the country. They partnered with the Tata Group, this allowed them to have excellent locations that would be in an ideal market for their product, which is the wealthier consumers. Starbucks also features their popular western products and they developed new products that are already popular within Indian culture. All of this combined together allows for globalization to be a smooth process with the proper research.
    Q 3. Howard Schultz commented at the store opening in Mumbai, ” It is perhaps the most elegant, beautiful, dynamic store we have opened in our history”. What aspects of consumer behavior do you feel were in his mind while making that comment.
    Relating to the comment, I believe Howard Shultz was referencing that Mumbai can be a very wealthy area and the consumers want to feel that way when relaxing, socializing and giving their business to Starbucks. Wealthy consumers want to feel special and be able to show off that they can spend more money at Starbucks, and providing a fancy well put together location can give them that experience that they desire.

    Like

  9. Ali Khan says:

    Q 1. Could IKEA and Home Depot have avoided some of the mistakes they made while entering the Chinese market. Explain how they might have done a better job of understanding and applying consumer behavior.

    Answer- Absolutely, if IKEA and Home Depot had invested more time into researching on a typical Indian/Chinese consumer behavior, they would have found out in advance that the DIY (Do It Yourself) culture is not so profound in India and China, as mentioned if a strategy is successful in one country doesn’t make it failproof in another, as consumers, their economy and culture varies. Taking into consideration, the example of Starbucks, where they invested 6 years of research before entering the Indian market, and they did benefit a lot from it as they gained useful insight upon consumer behavior, the culture and the economy of the Indian market.

    Q 2. How might a firm increase their chances of success while entering foreign markets. What steps did Starbucks take in this direction in India and China.

    Answer- Research and Development aka R&D is important for businesses because it provides powerful knowledge and insights, leads to improvements to existing processes where efficiency can be increased and costs reduced. It also allows businesses to develop new products and services to allow it to survive and thrive in competitive markets, or in the markets with a completely different culture, and that is exactly what Starbucks did before their entry into the Indian market, investing 6 years of consumer research. Another great step Starbucks took was their partnership with TATA, being one of the largest coffee producers in Asia, that certainly aided them a lot in their establishments in the Indian Market. On the other hand, in China, they had a specific menu for the Asian consumers, being Chinese teas and moon cakes, and also ventured into the possibility of more spacious surroundings, building bigger stores 3,800 sq. ft. and upward.

    Q 3. Howard Schultz commented at the store opening in Mumbai, ” It is perhaps the most elegant, beautiful, dynamic store we have opened in our history”. What aspects of consumer behavior do you feel were in his mind while making that comment.

    Answer- They have a saying in India, “Jo dikhta hai, Wo Bikta hai” translating to “What you display is what gets sold” and that is exactly the strategy Starbucks adopted upon their entry into the Indian market. Starbucks has a huge amount of fame in India even though when it wasn’t established, and the fame and hype of the name had to maintained, hence it all relates back to customer experience, meaning a more elegant, beautiful and dynamic store would lead to an exclusive customer experience, eventually leading the customers to leave satisfied and come back for more.

    Like

  10. Alejandra Marcado says:

    1. Ikea and Home Depot could have researched more in depth about the Chinese market before launching. Ikea for example could have avoided their decrease in PPP if they had researched that their Chinese customers were of lower income, on the other Home Depot should have known that Indian and Chinese locals prefer others to do things for them, rather than them doing it themselves. If both firms had taken the time to analyze their customers’ behavior, income, and preferences they would have avoided simple mistakes and succeeded in expanding their brand.

    2. All firms must research their consumer before marketing a product or opening a store. It is very crucial to know how to appeal your product or service to a specific consumer segment. Before Starbucks decided to expand their brand into both Indian and Chinese markets. It first went on a thorough research on the history of each country and how their historical background has impacted their culture and taste. After researching what kind of items to put on the menu, they also decided to partner with The Tata group making it easy for Starbucks to find locations where it was busy and where it was bound to gain the most profits. Moreover, by partnering with another foreign company, Starbucks was able to gain even more insight on their consumers and how to better combine “western and local taste”, which greatly appealed to their customers.

    3. Schultz describes that in his mind he wanted his stores to feel and look pleasant to their customers, while continuing in selling high end products and providing quality service which is one of the key factors of why Starbucks is still successful to this day. He also refers to how they have effectively expanded into indian markets and Starbucks is always ready to adapt to those differences to provide customers a better experience.

    Like

  11. imranraza says:

    Good job. Print and bring to next class.

    Like

  12. Joshua Parkinson says:

    Q 1. Could IKEA and Home Depot have avoided some of the mistakes they made while entering the Chinese market. Explain how they might have done a better job of under- standing and applying consumer behaviour.

    1. Home Depot and IKEA definitely could have avoided the mistakes they made while entering the Chinese market. There are lots of ways they could have done a better job of understanding consumer behaviour in these countries. For staters as the article states and from what the textbook says to enter a new market a company must understand that countries culture and what they like to do. In order for them to better understand the consumer behaviour in this country, they should have done their research as Starbucks did. For home depot, it could have been as simple as knowing that they would rather have someone build what they need, instead of a do it yourself model. So, in turn, if Home depot did consumer research or partnered with a similar company they could have survived in the market. If IKEA wants to survive it must continue to do consumer behaviour research and continue to understand that countries culture that they are in.

    Q 2. How might a firm increase their chances of success while entering foreign markets. What steps did Starbucks take in this direction in India and China.

    2. There are many ways a firm can increase their chances of success while entering a foreign market. It can range from spending time learning the countries culture and how things operate in that country, to spending time researching consumer behaviour in that country compared to the other countries they operate in and parenting up with a similar company in that country that can help and guide them in doing well in that country. Starbucks first for six years studied consumer behaviour and habits in India before entering. Secondly, they selected a very smart partnership in India, specifically the Tata Group a giant Indian conglomerate and one of the largest coffee producers in Asia. This partnership allowed Starbucks to get prime real estate in Mumbai and Delhi. All these steps paid off very well for Starbucks they already understood how to do good in India and China before entering because of their research. In China, Starbucks research paid off by understanding that Chinese consumers liked a spacious area to relax so Starbucks build a massive store bigger than usual to target this preference.

    Q 3. Howard Schultz commented at the store opening in Mumbai, ” It is perhaps the most elegant, beautiful, dynamic store we have opened in our history”. What aspects of consumer behaviour do you feel were in his mind while making that comment.

    3. I feel that when Howard Schultz made this comment about their store opening in Mumbai he is basing it off what they saw as the needs, wants, and preferences of the Indian consumer’s they are trying to target. It is also similar to what Starbucks is already like when he uses the words elegant, beautiful, and dynamic it enhances Starbucks idea of being a place to get your coffee and relax with people and talk or do your work in a very stress-free environment. The consumer behaviour he is referring to here is the idea of sensation and perception. The feeling and interpretation you well get well going to this Starbucks.

    Like

  13. Sahilpreet Singh says:

    Q 1. Could IKEA and Home Depot have avoided some of the mistakes they made while entering the Chinese market. Explain how they might have done a better job of under-standing and applying consumer behaviour.

    = Yeah I think IKEA and Home Depot surely avoided some mistakes by investing some more time into the research of the understanding of the Chinese culture and their style. They should know that by blending into the consumer mindset and into their comfort zone they should increase the chance of getting successful. While they may also team up or collaborate with any of the local businesses which should be already well renowned in the market to attract more of their customers towards them, it also can do good because people don’t trust new products or business usually but by collaborating with an already well-renowned brand it somehow eases off the tension of the consumers because they think it will be good if it is with a local brand. Moreover by understanding the nature of people of certain nations can also help as we already know DIY type of products are not that supported in most of the Asian countries.

    Q 2. How might a firm increase their chances of success while entering foreign markets. What steps did Starbucks take in this direction in India and China.

    = There are some ways by which firms might improve their chance of success while planning into entering the foreign market is that they should create more public knowledge and awareness of their products and policies by advertising their propaganda because by these more and more people know about their product and a company who is seeking into entering the new market should also do their research about the nature of people of that area and also more to that they should try to localized the local company in that ways they can get better access to sources and information. In the term of Starbucks, it goes with a glocalization technique (a mix of a worldwide and neighbourhood system) to prevail in India and China, adjusting the item taking special care of nearby preferences simultaneously keeping up with its Western picture internationally through offering its unique assistance and item ideas too which tooks a good hit and making Starbucks famous, as in India it partnered with Tata group which gives Starbucks a good platform sidewise keeping it with adequate raw material.

    Q 3. Howard Schultz commented at the store opening in Mumbai, ” It is perhaps the most elegant, beautiful, dynamic store we have opened in our history”. What aspects of consumer behaviour do you feel were in his mind while making that comment.

    = The type of consumer behaviour which was seen in the words of Howard Schultz after the opening of their store in Mumbai must be that he is pleased with the results of their first-ever store in India and because they spend a lot of time and huge price for the infrastructure on it. They also collaborate with the Tata group to bring in more localized feeling because first of all it help them in getting suitable locations to open the new stores also it provides them with local leadership and local labour saving a lot of their time and money because no one can know more about their land than any local.

    Like

  14. mehrsa bahrami vala says:

    Q1 ANSWER: ikea and home depot could have avoided some of the mistakes before entering the chinese market by doing more in dept research on the local consumer behaviors amd what they preferred. They could have adapted their product offerings , pricing,the store format to better align with chinese consumer expectations . Understanding their culture more and adjusting strategies according to that might have prevented some of the challenges.
    Q2 ANSWER:the chance of success in foreign markets is higher with market research, understanding the local consumer behaviour and adopting a glocalization strategy can increase in firms.
    Q3 ANSWER:when howard schultz commented how the store in mumbai in very beautiful and elegant he considered the costumers appreciation. Understanding and adjusting to the cultural prefrences of consumers including their desire for a aesthetic environment is crucial for creating a positive environment to attract customers.
    Q4ANSWER:to reduce the political risk and losses faced by leaving russia companies should have proactively assessed the geopolitical situation before entering the market . They have to closely analyze the risk, understanding the political climate would have been essential. they also have to establish local partnership and closely moniter developments can help the companies avoid such uncertainty.

    Like

  15. Navjot Sekhon says:

    I believe that Starbucks did a great job by doing collaboration with company Tata Group because team work teaches us a lot about how to do better work with a company that had already constructed in market and take less time to learn more about that and give many opportunities to gain success.

    I like the idea of Starbucks doing a complete research before to expand their brand and to entering in new foreign market because it is always helpful to know the historical background of something to invent a similar product or anything like that.

    Interesting article, thanks

    Like

Leave a comment